These two paragraphs were tucked away at the end of the section, after
the diversion on backslashes. I nearly missed the first paragraph and
opened a nonsense issue, and I think the second belongs higher up with
it too.
- Formalise release cadence guidelines
- Overhaul release steps to be easier to follow and more thorough
- Reorder changelog template to something more sensible
- Update release automation docs to reflect recent improvements (notably
the addition of in-repo mypyc wheel builds)
Co-authored-by: Felix Hildén <felix.hilden@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
`black.reformat_many` depends on a lot of slow-to-import modules. When
formatting simply a single file, the time paid to import those modules
is totally wasted. So I moved `black.reformat_many` and its helpers
to `black.concurrency` which is now *only* imported if there's more
than one file to reformat. This way, running Black over a single file
is snappier
Here are the numbers before and after this patch running `python -m
black --version`:
- interpreted: 411 ms +- 9 ms -> 342 ms +- 7 ms: 1.20x faster
- compiled: 365 ms +- 15 ms -> 304 ms +- 7 ms: 1.20x faster
Co-authored-by: Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com>
* Recommend using BlackConnect in IntelliJ IDEs
* IntelliJ IDEs integration docs: improve formatting
* Add changelog for recommending BlackConnect
* IntelliJ IDEs integration docs: improve formatting
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard Si <63936253+ichard26@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix indentation
* Apply italic to Black name
Consequently with other places in the document
* Move CHANGELOG entry to Unreleased section
* IntelliJ IDEs integration docs: bring back a point with formatting a file
* IntelliJ IDEs integration docs: fix extra whitespace and linebreak
Co-authored-by: Richard Si <63936253+ichard26@users.noreply.github.com>
Covers GH-2926, GH-2990, GH-2991, and GH-3035.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Si <63936253+ichard26@users.noreply.github.com>
We just got someone on Discord who was confused because the command as
written caused their shell to try to do command expansion.
Co-authored-by: Richard Si <63936253+ichard26@users.noreply.github.com>
I realized we don't have a FAQ entry about this, let's change that so
compiled: yes/no doesn't surprise as many people :)
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Now PRs will run two diff-shades jobs, "preview-changes" which formats
all projects with preview=True, and "assert-no-changes" which formats
all projects with preview=False. The latter also fails if any changes
were made.
Pushes to main will only run "preview-changes"
Also the workflow_dispatch feature was dropped since it was
complicating everything for little gain.
- use `Black` directly: the commands an autocommand runs are Ex commands, so no
execute or colon is necessary.
- use an `augroup` (best practice) to prevent duplicate autocommands from
hindering performance.
I did this manually for the last few releases and I think it's going to be
helpful in the future too. Unfortunately this adds a little more work during
the release (sorry @cooperlees).
This change will also improve the merge conflict situation a bit, because
changes to different sections won't merge conflict.
For the last release, the sections were in a kind of random order. In the
template I put highlights and "Style" first because they're most important
to users, and alphabetized the rest.
At the moment, it's just a source of spurious CI failures and busywork
updating the configuration file.
Unlike diff-shades, it is run across many different platforms and
Python versions, but that doesn't seem essential. We already run unit
tests across platforms and versions.
I chose to leave the code around for now in case somebody is using it,
but CI will no longer run it.
Since power operators almost always have the highest binding power in expressions, it's often more readable to hug it with its operands. The main exception to this is when its operands are non-trivial in which case the power operator will not hug, the rule for this is the following:
> For power ops, an operand is considered "simple" if it's only a NAME, numeric CONSTANT, or attribute access (chained attribute access is allowed), with or without a preceding unary operator.
Fixes GH-538.
Closes GH-2095.
diff-shades results: https://gist.github.com/ichard26/ca6c6ad4bd1de5152d95418c8645354b
Co-authored-by: Diego <dpalma@evernote.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Hildén <felix.hilden@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
