`black.strings.get_string_prefix` used to lowercase the extracted
prefix before returning it. This is wrong because 1) it ignores the
fact we should leave R prefixes alone because of MagicPython, and 2)
there is dedicated prefix casing handling code that fixes issue 1.
`.lower` is too naive.
This was originally fixed in 20.8b0, but was reintroduced since 21.4b0.
I also added proper prefix normalization for docstrings by using the
`black.strings.normalize_string_prefix` helper.
Some more test strings were added to make sure strings with capitalized
prefixes aren't treated differently (actually happened with my original
patch, Jelle had to point it out to me).
This commit adds a short section discussing the non-processing of docstrings
besides spacing improvements, mentions comment moving and links to the
AST equivalence discussion. I also added a simple spacing test for good
measure.
Commit history before merge:
* Mention comment non-processing in documentation, add spacing test
* Mention special cases for comment spacing
* Add all special cases, improve wording
Not sure the fix is right. Here is what I found: issue is connected
with line
first.prefix = prefix[comment.consumed :]
in `comments.py`. `first.prefix` is a prefix of the line, that ends
with `# fmt: skip`, but `comment.consumed` is the length of the
`" # fmt: skip"` string. If prefix length is greater than 14,
`first.prefix` will grow every time we apply formatting.
Fixes#2254
PR #2286 did not fix the edge-cases (e.g. when the string is just long
enough to cause a line to be 89 characters long). This PR corrects that
mistake.
Resolves#2168 by disabling the insertion of a " " when the docstring is entirely empty.
Note that this PR is focussed only on the case of empty docstrings. In particular this does not make any changes to the behaviour that a " " is inserted if a non-empty docstring begins with the quoting character. That is, black still prefers:
""" "something" """
to:
""""something" """
and that:
""""Something""""
is not a legal docstring.
Commit history before merge:
Black now respects .gitignore files in all levels, not only root/.gitignore file
(apply .gitignore rules like git does).
* Fix: typo
* Fix: respect .gitignore files in all levels.
* Add: CHANGELOG note.
* Fix: TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'PathSpec'
* Update docs.
* Fix: no parent .gitignore
* Add a comment since the if expression is a bit hard to understand
* Update tests - conver no parent .gitignore case.
* Use main's Pipfile.lock instead
The original changes in Pipfile.lock are whitespace only. The changes
turned the JSON's file indentation from 4 to 2. Effectively this
happened: `json.dumps(json.loads(old_pipfile_lock), indent=2) + "\n"`.
Just using main's Pipfile.lock instead of undoing the changes because
1) I don't know how to do that easily and quickly, and 2) there's a
merge conflict.
Co-authored-by: Richard Si <63936253+ichard26@users.noreply.github.com>
* Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into i1730 …
conflicts for days ay?
Closes#2164.
Changes behavior of how .gitignore is handled. With this change, the rules in .gitignore are only used as a fallback if no exclusion rule is explicitly passed on the command line or in pyproject.toml. Previously they were used regardless if explicit exclusion rules were specified, preventing any overriding of .gitignore rules.
Those that depend only on .gitignore for their exclusion rules will not be affected. Those that use both .gitignore and exclude will find that exclude will act more like actually specifying exclude and not just another extra-excludes. If the previous behavior was desired, they should move their rules from exclude to extra-excludes.
Previously the RELAXED_DECORATOR detection would be falsely True on that
example. The problem was that an argument-less parentheses pair didn't
pass the `is_simple_decorator_trailer` check even it should. OTOH a
parentheses pair containing an argument or more passed as expected.
We're only fixing them so fuzzers don't yell at us when we break "valid"
code. I mean "valid" because some of the examples aren't even accepted by
Python.
Black would previously strip the parenthesis away from statements like this these ones:
assert (spam := 12 + 1)
return (cheese := 1 - 12)
Which happens to be invalid code. Now before making the parenthesis invisible, Black
checks if the assignment expression's parent is an assert stamtment, aborting if True.
Raise, yield, and await are already handled fine.
I added a bunch of test cases from the PEP defining asssignment expressions (PEP 572).
Fixes#1738. Fixes#1812.
Previously, Black removed leading and trailing spaces in multiline docstrings but failed to remove them from one-line docstrings.
Fixes: #1662
Work-around for https://bugs.python.org/issue2142
The test has to slightly mess with its input data, because the utility
functions default to ensuring the test data has a final newline, which
defeats the point of the test.
Signed-off-by: Paul "TBBle" Hampson <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>
The `fix_docstring` function expanded all tabs, which caused a
difference in the AST representation when those tabs were inline and not
leading. This changes the function to only expand leading tabs so inline
tabs are preserved.
Fixes#1601.
Black used to erroneously remove all empty lines between non-function
code and decorators when formatting typing stubs. Now a single empty
line is enforced.
I chose for putting empty lines around decorated classes that have empty
bodies since removing empty lines around such classes would cause a
formatting issue that seems to be impossible to fix.
For example:
```
class A: ...
@some_decorator
class B: ...
class C: ...
class D: ...
@some_other_decorator
def foo(): -> None: ...
```
It is easy to enforce no empty lines between class A, B, and C.
Just return 0, 0 for a line that is a decorator and precedes an stub
class. Fortunately before this commit, empty lines after that class
would be removed already.
Now let's look at the empty line between class D and function foo. In
this case, there should be an empty line there since it's class code next
to function code. The problem is that when deciding to add X empty lines
before a decorator, you can't tell whether it's before a class or a
function. If the decorator is before a function, then an empty line
is needed, while no empty lines are needed when the decorator is
before a class.
So even though I personally prefer no empty lines around decorated
classes, I had to go the other way surrounding decorated classes with
empty lines.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
* Fix incorrect space before colon in if/while stmts
Previously Black would format this code
```
if (foo := True):
print(foo)
```
as
```
if (foo := True) :
print(foo)
```
adding an incorrect space after the RPAR. Buggy code in the
normalize_invisible_parens function caused the colon to be wrapped in
invisible parentheses. The LPAR of that pair was then prefixed with a
single space at the request of the whitespace function.
This commit fixes the accidental skipping of a pre-condition check
which must return True before parenthesis normalization of a specific
child Leaf or Node can happen. The pre-condition check being skipped
was why the colon was wrapped in invisible parentheses.
* Add an entry in CHANGES.md
The quotes of multiline docstrings are now only normalized when string
normalization is off, instead of the string normalization setting being
ignored and the quotes being *always* normalized.
I had to make a new test case and data file since the current pair for
docstrings only worked when there is no formatting difference between the
formatting results with string normalization on and off. I needed to add
tests for when there *are* differences between the two. So I split
test_docstring's test code when string normalization is disabled into a
new test case along with a new data file.
This addresses a few crashers, namely:
* producing non-equivalent code due to mangling escaped newlines,
* invalid hugging quote characters in the docstring body to the docstring outer
triple quotes (causing a quadruple quote which is a syntax error),
* lack of handling for docstrings that start on the same line as the `def`, and
* invalid stripping of outer triple quotes when the docstring contained
a string prefix.
As a bonus, tests now also run when string normalization is disabled.
This required some hackery. Long story short, we need to reuse the ability to
omit rightmost bracket pairs (which glues them together and splits on something
else instead), for use with pre-existing trailing commas.
This form of user-controlled formatting is brittle so we have to be careful not
to cause a scenario where Black first formats code without trailing commas in
one way, and then looks at the same file with pre-existing trailing commas
(that it itself put on the previous run) and decides to format the code again.
One particular ugly edge case here is handling of optional parentheses. In
particular, the long-standing `line_length=1` hack got in the way of
pre-existing trailing commas and had to be removed. Instead, a more
intelligent but costly solution was put in place: a "second opinion" if the
formatting that omits optional parentheses ended up causing lines to be too
long. Again, for efficiency purposes, Black reuses Leaf objects from blib2to3
and modifies them in place, which was invalid for having two separate
formattings. Line cloning was used to mitigate this.
Fixes#1619
- when a trailing comma is specified in any bracket pair, that signals to Black
that this bracket pair needs to be always exploded, e.g. presented as "one
item per line";
- this causes some changes to previously formatted code that erroneously left
trailing commas embedded into single-line expressions;
- internally, Black needs to be able to identify trailing commas that it put
itself compared to pre-existing trailing commas. We do this by using/abusing
lib2to3's `was_checked` attribute. It's True for internally generated
trailing commas and False for pre-existing ones (in fact, for all
pre-existing leaves and nodes).
Fixes#1288
* put experimental string stuff behind a flag
* update tests
* don't need an output section if it's the same as the input
* Primer: Expect no formatting changes in attrs, hypothesis and poetry with --experimental-string-processing off
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
