5918a016ff
Travis CI for Open Source is shutting down in a few weeks so the queue for jobs is insane due to lower resources. I'm 99.99% sure we don't need it as our Test, Lint, Docs, Upload / Package, Primer, and Fuzz workflows are all on GitHub Actions. So even though we *can* migrate to the .com version with its 1000 free Linux minutes(?), I don't think we need to. more information here: - https://blog.travis-ci.com/oss-announcement - https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing - https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/migrate/open-source-repository-migration This commit does the following: - delete the Travis CI configuration - add to the GHA test workflows so coverage continues to be recorded - tweaked coverage configuration so this wouldn't break - remove any references to Travis CI in the docs (i.e. readme + sphinx docs) Regarding the Travis CI to GitHub Actions Coveralls transition, the official action doesn't support the coverage files produced by coverage.py unfornately. Also no, I don't really know what I am doing so don't @ me if this breaks :p (well you can, but don't expect me to be THAT useful). The Coveralls setup has two downfalls AFAIK: - Only Linux runs are used because AndreMiras/coveralls-python-action only supports Linux. Although this isn't a big issue since the Travis Coveralls configuration only used Linux data too. - Pull requests from an internal branch (i.e. one on psf/black) will be marked as a push coverage build by Coveralls since our anti-duplicate- workflows system runs under the push even for such cases.
9 lines
97 B
INI
9 lines
97 B
INI
[report]
|
|
omit =
|
|
src/blib2to3/*
|
|
tests/data/*
|
|
*/site-packages/*
|
|
|
|
[run]
|
|
relative_files = True
|