ad5c315dda
The former was a regression I introduced a long time ago. To avoid
changing the stable style too much, the regression is only fixed if
--preview is enabled
Annoyingly enough, as we currently always enforce a second format pass if
changes were made, there's no good way to prove the existence of the
docstring quote normalization instability issue. For posterity, here's
one failing example:
--- source
+++ first pass
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
def some_function(self):
- ''''<text here>
+ """ '<text here>
<text here, since without another non-empty line black is stable>
- '''
+ """
pass
--- first pass
+++ second pass
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
def some_function(self):
- """ '<text here>
+ """'<text here>
<text here, since without another non-empty line black is stable>
"""
pass
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
11 lines
357 B
Python
11 lines
357 B
Python
def do_not_touch_this_prefix():
|
|
R"""There was a bug where docstring prefixes would be normalized even with -S."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
def do_not_touch_this_prefix2():
|
|
F'There was a bug where docstring prefixes would be normalized even with -S.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
def do_not_touch_this_prefix3():
|
|
uR'''There was a bug where docstring prefixes would be normalized even with -S.'''
|