Bracket depth is not an accurate indicator of standalone comment position inside more complex blocks because bracket depth can be virtual (in loops' and lambdas' parameter blocks) or from optional parens. Here we try to stop cumulating lines upon standalone comments in complex blocks, and try to make standalone comment processing more simple. The fundamental idea is, that if we have a standalone comment, it needs to go on its own line, so we always have to split.
This is not perfect, but at least a first step.
Python does not consider f-strings to be docstrings, so we probably
shouldn't be formatting them as such
Fixes#4018
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
* fix indentation of line breaks in long type hints by adding parentheses, and remove unnecessary parentheses
* add entry in CHANGES.md, make the style change only in preview mode
The idea behind this change is that we stop looking into previous body to determine if there should be a blank before a function or class definition.
Input:
```python
import sys
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
class Nested1:
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
class Nested2:
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
def nested1():
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
def nested2():
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
```
Stable style
```python
import sys
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
class Nested1:
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
class Nested2:
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
def nested1():
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
def nested2():
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
```
In the stable formatting, we have a blank line sometimes, not depending on the previous statement on the same level, but on the last (potentially nested) statement in the previous body.
#2783/#3564 fixes this for classes in preview style:
```python
import sys
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
class Nested1:
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
class Nested2:
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
def nested1():
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
def nested2():
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
```
This PR additionally fixes this for function definitions:
```python
if sys.version_info > (3, 7):
if sys.platform == "win32":
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
def f1(self) -> str: ...
if sys.platform != "win32":
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
def f2(self) -> str: ...
if sys.version_info > (3, 8):
if sys.platform == "win32":
assignment = 1
def function_definition(self): ...
class F1: ...
if sys.platform != "win32":
def function_definition(self): ...
assignment = 1
class F2: ...
```
You can see the effect of this change on typeshed in https://github.com/konstin/typeshed/pull/1/files. As baseline, the preview mode changes without this PR are at https://github.com/konstin/typeshed/pull/2.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
This PR updates an assert statement that checks the bounds of a
string-slicing operation. The updated assertion provides more accurate
and informative error handling by specifically checking the relative
values of the indices and the string length.
The original assertion was essentially checking if Python's string
slicing was behaving as expected. However, it wasn't providing any
guarantees or useful information about the bounds i and j themselves.
The updated assertion checks that the indices used for slicing are
within the bounds of the string. It will throw an AssertionError if the
indices are out of bounds or if i > j, providing a more specific and
informative error.
